![]() Google intends to have its Android Market be the central repository for the vast majority of mobile app distribution. This should make Google’s intentions very clear. Furthermore, keep in mind that this kill switch will only affect apps distributed through the Market, not those installed from the Web. This functionality is built right into Android and isn’t the weekend project of some particularly clever hacker. To put it bluntly, Android has a multitude of possible channels for the distribution of apps. But if an owner of an Android phone decides not to use the Market, this user need only visit another site with Android applications to install anyr mobile app outside of Google’s purview. An Android user has the Android Market, while an iPhone user has the App Store. Google made an extremely smart decision in its development of Android and the ways users can install applications, by doing what Apple should have done all along. ![]() The main difference between these two tech giants is in their respective models of application distribution. However, this fear is unjustified here, and, in fact, I would go so far as to say that Google’s kill switch is actually a good move. As a result, some fear has been spreading that Google might also pursue similarly obnoxious policies. Not surprisingly, Apple closed this distribution channel to him as well. But it did make trouble for a developer when the author of the controversial Podcaster application decided to distribute his application via the iPhone’s “ad hoc” back channel, originally intended for developers to do beta testing with a limited number of users. ![]() ![]() As we know, Apple’s developer agreement turned out to be much more trouble than initially anticipated, causing a storm of criticism around the developer NDA and Apple’s disqualification of apps that “ duplicated functionality” of other Apple applications.Īpple hasn’t deleted any apps that have made their way onto iPhones. While the terms of this agreement certainly seem reasonable, tech critics thought back to February, when Apple explained its own terms of service for the iPhone, which also seemed reasonable at the time. In other words, Google has a built-in “kill switch” to remotely disable applications that violate their developer agreement. Google may discover a product that violates the developer distribution agreement … in such an instance, Google retains the right to remotely remove those applications from your device at its sole discretion. ”Gasp!” went the collective Internet on Wednesday when the IDG News Service spotted a clause in the terms of service for Google’s Android Market stating that: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |